墨明棋妙
发表于8分钟前
回复
:During the Second World War, following an ambush carried out in a fort by German troops, Eugène, an Allied soldier, finds himself trapped underground. Now fighting for his survival, his destiny will play out alongside that of another survivor. Both will try to find the resources to extricate themselves from certain death. They are unaware that terrible battles await them outside.
蒋雅文
发表于7分钟前
回复
:不丹村官敦杜(Tsewang Dandup 饰)很快厌倦了乡村乏味的生活,怀念大城市的绚烂,并计划借朋友的关系前往梦想之地——美国。敦杜在帕罗节(不丹最大的宗教节日)期间请假,不声不响的包好行李,踏上了前往美国的旅程。在乡村公路旁,敦杜邂逅一位僧人,后者为他讲述了一个梦想之地的故事:不丹青年塔西荒废了自己法术的学业,整日心中只是思量女人,这天他骑上了新买的马,却被马儿丢弃在森林深处,塔西向林中的隐居老人求助,并被他年轻貌美的妻子吸引,遂滞留此处。不久塔西和老人的对立愈发明显……在故事之外,敦杜和僧人的旅程中加入了一位少女,这使敦杜的看法发生了些许变化……本片由多才多艺的活佛宗萨钦哲仁波切拍摄,而他在拍摄电影之前曾经担任贝托鲁奇《小活佛》一片的顾问。
江华
发表于4分钟前
回复
:A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb