故事发生在十九世纪末的四川，福利出生在农村的郑么姑（许晴 饰）嫁给了杂货铺的老板蔡兴顺，福利成为了杂货铺老板娘。蔡兴顺性格老实而又木讷，非常不解风情，而郑么姑拥有美艳的外表，一娶进门便已经引来了风言风语。幸运的是，蔡兴顺有一个德高望重的表哥罗德生（尤勇 饰），每当有人想要欺负郑么姑时，总是罗德胜出面抵挡回去，一来二去之间，郑么姑和罗德胜之间产生了不应该有的感情。罗德胜离乡数年，带回了想要从良的妓女刘三金（程希 饰），利用刘三金的美色榨干了粮户顾天成（赵军 饰）的腰包，也正是刘三金的出现让郑么姑和罗德胜决定不再压抑他们的感情。
回复 :特伦斯·戴维斯典雅的艺术杰作，一部能体现出鲜明的英国风格的影片。剧情围绕在二战结束后不久，一个利物浦的工人阶级家庭的一桩婚事展开，并由一位有时而显得残酷的父亲穿插于各种情节中。这部电影的魅力由那些具有深刻艺术性的镜头构成，并结合了导演本身和演员对角色的把握，特别是精彩地演绎了父亲这一角色的皮特·波斯尔思韦特。
回复 :在险恶的日据时代，赛德克族被迫失去自己的文化信仰，男人须服劳役不得狩猎、女人帮佣不能编织彩衣，骁勇善战的英雄莫那鲁道（林庆台 Ching-tai Lin 饰），见证三十年来的压迫统治。因一场误会种下日警和赛德克族的紧张关係，自此族人便活在恐遭日警报复的阴霾中，忍辱负重的莫那鲁道在深思后，虽知将面临灭族危机，但他明白唯有挺身为民族尊严反击，才能成为真正的赛德克人，于是决心带领族人循着祖灵之训示，夺回属于他们的猎场……
回复 :Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
