大半生在银幕上历遍人间生离,亚洲9页年逾古稀却怎也无法在镜头前演出死别一刻。趁剧组停拍,亚洲9页资深演员到蔚蓝海岸探望故友。来到荒废大宅,偶遇拿着摄影机拍鬼片的孩童,唤起《四百击》(1959)男孩与电影初邂逅的情缘;梦回与貌美如昔的情人灵魂相遇,重拾一生铭记的爱恋。生命将尽之际,终领悟怎样与死亡共存。诹访敦彦给法国新浪潮的情书,让特吕弗与戈达尔爱将让-皮埃尔·利奥德,将前世今生铭刻于光影里。且唱一阕狮子的挽歌,化作生命礼赞,伴随梦去。
大半生在银幕上历遍人间生离,亚洲9页年逾古稀却怎也无法在镜头前演出死别一刻。趁剧组停拍,亚洲9页资深演员到蔚蓝海岸探望故友。来到荒废大宅,偶遇拿着摄影机拍鬼片的孩童,唤起《四百击》(1959)男孩与电影初邂逅的情缘;梦回与貌美如昔的情人灵魂相遇,重拾一生铭记的爱恋。生命将尽之际,终领悟怎样与死亡共存。诹访敦彦给法国新浪潮的情书,让特吕弗与戈达尔爱将让-皮埃尔·利奥德,将前世今生铭刻于光影里。且唱一阕狮子的挽歌,化作生命礼赞,伴随梦去。
回复 :根据玛拉沁夫同名小说改编。 50年代初期,内蒙古草原上的牧民,在党和政府的领导下,为将草原建设得更加美好而辛勤劳动着。女共青团员、互助组长萨仁格娃,曾连续两年获得劳动模范称号。她与另一个互助组长、打猎能手桑布真诚相爱。当草原上的广大牧民忙着发展生产的时候,暗藏的特务宝鲁企图挑动萨仁格娃的父亲白依热退出互助组,以达到拆散互助组的目的,遭到斥责。在一次暴风雪中,宝鲁割断牲畜栏杆的绳子,打开马圈和羊圈,放跑了牲畜。萨仁格娃为救牲畜骑着马从崖上摔了下来,幸亏桑布赶来相救。由于牧民们团结一致,将放出的牲畜都及时赶回,未能给互助组造成很大的损失。风暴季节已过,在萨仁格娃为受伤的牲畜防疫注射时,宝鲁乘人不备,把毒药投进井里,毒死了萨仁格娃小组里的二十多只羊,并妄图以羊群中毒的事情嫁祸于萨仁格娃。萨仁格娃为互助组失去那么多羊而伤心,情绪有些波动。她在区长阿木古郎的教育和帮助下,认识到不能只想个人的荣誉,要为大家着想,为内蒙古大草原和祖国的建设着想。不久,宝鲁在特务吕绶卿的指使下,想趁那达慕大会开幕时,放火破坏草原的建设。一年一度的那达慕大会开幕了。会上有各种活动:物资交易、评选模范、赛马、射箭等,热闹非凡。在评选模范的会上,有人对萨仁格娃领导的互助组死羊之事,表示不满。萨仁格娃认为组里羊死了,自己是有责任的,一定要把这件事搞清楚。会后,萨仁格娃牵着马在河边溜达时,看到宝鲁鬼鬼祟祟的,身上还带着枪,便奋不顾身地骑马追去。她赶到山坡,已看不见宝鲁的踪影,却发现牧场燃起了大火。萨仁格娃断定这火是宝鲁放的,就拍马冲过浓烟烈火去抓宝鲁。这时,盟长亲自带领群众救火,大家齐心协力很快就把火扑灭了。在萨仁格娃、桑布的帮助下,公安人员将宝鲁、吕绶卿等一小撮潜伏特务一网打尽。当大家知道萨仁格娃小组的死羊是特务投毒所致时,对于勇敢的萨仁格娃更加敬佩了。在庆功会上,盟长称赞萨仁格娃不仅是劳动上的模范,而且在防风暴、防火灾、与特务作斗争上,也表现出奋不顾身的勇敢,为草原上的人们立了一大功
回复 :音乐人鲁迪(艾伦·卡明 Alan Cumming 饰)在从事变装表演时邂逅地区检察官保罗(加瑞特·迪拉胡特 Garret Dillahunt 饰),两人一见钟情。晚上回家后鲁迪被邻居喧哗搅得无法休息,当他气势汹汹的上门投诉,却惊讶发现原来屋里只有一个叫马可(埃萨克·莱瓦 Isaac Leyva 饰)的矮胖男孩。鲁迪尝试联络保罗商量对策,但由于马可存在先天智力缺陷,妈妈又因为吸毒而被捕,很快家庭福利署就将马科带走了。后来当鲁迪和保罗看到马可一个人在街头流浪时,他们没有多做考虑就将男孩带回了家。 两人反复讨论后决定收养马可,为他提供一个安稳的生活环境。 不料法院在审核监护权的过程中发现了他们的性取向,法律体系就像一把枷锁狠狠劈来,要斩断他们和那个有特殊障碍、但他们却视如己出的男孩的关系......本片根据真人真事改编,背景设定在70年代的美国加州,讲述了一对同性恋伴侣如何与偏狭的社会观念和法律体系抗争,争取一个智力缺陷男孩的抚养权的故事。本片获得2012年芝加哥国际电影节、棕榈泉国际电影节、西雅图国际电影节和纽约翠贝卡电影节的观众选择奖。
回复 :Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.'By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses.Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together.One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around.While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with hisher partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken.Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...